Catch the Wave! (Attempt Number One) – Free Line 12/01/09

“I am not familiar with the thing I’m seeing.” – Calculon; Futurama

It took me a week, but I finally got my invitation for Google Wave. For those unaware, Google Wave is a new protocol that allows users to do … um … something. This is where the problems come in. I have been using this program for a little over three hours now, but I still have no idea what I should be doing. So in order to keep this blog post moving, I will be quoting the Wave’s Wikipedia page verbatim.

“[Google Wave] is a web-based service, computing platform, and communications protocol designed to merge e-mail, instant messaging, wikis, and social networking. It has a strong collaborative and real-time focus supported by extensions that can provide, for example, spelling/grammar checking, automated translation among 40 languages, and numerous other extensions.”

There. Doesn’t that clean things up? [Pause] No, it didn’t help me in the least either.To put things in another way, here is how a friend of mine described our “mystery program:”

“[Google Wave is] Google trying to make their own instant messaging program. Yes, I know that Google already one of those [Google Talk], but that isn’t enough. This is Google, after all. It has to be all “hip” and “cool.” So they threw in all of this trendy stuff [wiki, social network, microblogging] along with the instant messenger program to appeal to … someone, I guess. What you’re left with is a pile of confusing buttons and windows that really don’t make any sense at all.”

Okay … that made a little more sense, but still not much. Still, it shouldn’t stop me from trying this thing out, right? So without further adieu, let’s see what Google Wave is really all about.

Two hours later…

As many of you know, we here at the Free Line pride ourselves on conquering the impossible. In the past twenty-one months, we have done everything from run a ten year old copy of Netscape Navigator on Windows Vista to compare an animated television program about a talking dog and kickboxing chickens to professional wrestling. Still, there are some things that even I cannot wrap my head around. This, sadly, is one of those unfortunate moments. That is not to say that I am completely giving up on trying to make this thing work, mind you. Come tomorrow, I will have a post full of my experiences … I hope.


Showdown: We Are the World Elite (Day One) – Free Line 11/18/09

There are times in life when we simply need to a break from the ordinary. Home might be great, but every now and again, you need to get out and see the world. That is exactly what today’s Showdown is all about. So join us as we look at some of the best apps, services, and online book depositories the world has to offer. We begin our journey in Canada.

App #1: Shopify

Website: http://www.shopify.com/
Developer: JadedPixel Inc.
Country of Origin: Canada
Specialty: Web store construction
First Impression: “Well, it certainly looks interesting…”

App #2: YubNub

Website: http://yubnub.org/
Developer: Jon Aquino
Country of Origin: Canada
Specialty: A “social command line”
First Impression: “I am not familiar with the thing that I am seeing.”

App #3: Zapr

Website: https://www.zapr.com/index.aspx
Developer: Zapr
Country of Origin: Australia
Specialty: Simple file sharing
First Impression: “Neat. Do I have to download something, or is all of this done from their website?”

App #4: Pixenate

Website: http://pixenate.com/
Developer: Sxoop Technologies
Country of Origin: Ireland
Specialty: Image editor
First Impression: “Ooooh … free hand drawing. I can draw a shaky line onto a mountain!”

App #5: Trexy

Website: http://trexy.com/
Developer: Trexy Limited
Country of Origin: United Kingdom
Specialty: Um … We’re not exactly sure at the moment…
First Impression: “What is this? Did Rudolph switch to Linux or something?”

App #6: Zlio

Website: http://www.zlio.com/
Developer: Zlio Inc.
Country of Origin: France
Specialty: Web store creator
First Impression: “Wait… You don’t even sell your own products? That’s weird…”

App #7: InternationellaBiblioteket.se

Website: http://www.interbib.se/default.asp?id=13552
Developer: The city of Stockholm, among other governmental agencies
Country of Origin: Sweden
Specialty: social network/library database
First Impression: “So … Want to borrow a book from the Stockholm Public Library system?”
Second Impressions: “It seems as if I can also go to the Diet Library of Japan, get a Swedish driver’s license, or visit the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies. This should definitely be interesting…”

App #8: Telesa.tv

Website: http://telesa.tv/
Developer: Telesa
Country of Origin: Russia
Specialty: Original, professionally produced, web-based television programming … in Russian.
First Impression: “Is there any way to switch the language to English? Also, a cartoon angel may be telling me the weather. I have no idea why.”

App #9: The Power of Politics

Website: http://www.powerofpolitics.com/StartNew.aspx
Developer: TPM Games GmbH
Country of Origin: Austria
App Type: Web-based, politically charged strategy game.
First Impression: “So I play as a politician, right? [Pause] Man … I’m going to lose. I’m going to lose bad. As soon as the other players find out how bad I am, they are going to attack me. ‘She’s terrible at this. Let’s bomb her district for fun!’ “

App #10: Aprex

Website: http://www.aprex.com.br/home.php
Developer: Aprex Solutions
Country of Origin: Brazil
Specialty: Office suite/online storage
First Impression: “Now this could be useful.”


Showdown Special, Part Three: Rhapsody on the iPhone (Day Two) – Free Line 11/16/09

…And now, part two of our “date with Rhapsody.” Before we can get the new material, we need to see where we have been.

Website: http://www.rhapsody.com
Developer:
RealNetworks
App Type: Music store/audio streaming
The Test: After an astonishing three overtime periods, the Rhapsody player beat the Slacker app in terms of sound quality, three to two. It must be mentioned, however, that the Slacker service has a much bigger back catalog. (More on this later.)

…And with that, we can finally move forward. Enjoy!

The Positives: Starting at one and working towards three…

  1. You would be surprised how handy having an “entire library of music in your pocket” can be.
  2. The entire “streaming” process is incredibly smooth and pain free. Just click on the song you want and away you go.
  3. Discovering new music is a breeze. Thanks to Rhapsody, I found myself listening to bands and tracks that I haven’t heard from in years, such as experimental rock band Self and the undisputed king of “Avant-garde bubblegum” himself, Todd Rundgren.

Of course, every list of positives has to be accompanied by a list of negatives. From the top:

  1. The library itself is rather “incomplete,” shall we say. I find it interesting that Rhapsody has music by little-known, Southern gospel tinged, jam band Sweet Vine but has a grand total of five songs from the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Not five albums, mind you. Five songs. I understand the “limitations” put upon services like this by record labels and whatnot, but that is borderline ridiculous.
  2. How much would you pay for an app such as this? Five dollars a month? Seven? According to the fine folks at RealNetworks, the “correct” price for the Rhapsody service is a whopping fifteen dollars a month. I really am enjoying myself, but not that much.
  3. According to Rhapsody, every soundtrack, film score, and multiple-musician live album was actually produced by a band called “Various Artists.” No other names are listed. That little “omission” gets to be extremely annoying, especially when you find yourself digging through some little known compilation album looking for your favorite band or artist.
  4. I like it when radio stations, both traditional and otherwise, throw the listener a proverbial “curve ball” and play something a bit unexpected. Rhapsody Radio, on the other hand, abuses the privilege on a fairly regular basis. The “Soft Sounds” station, for example, featured terminally depressed new wave band The Cure, southern folk super group The Thorns, and Neil Sedaka all in a row. I like being “challenged,” but that is, once again, ridiculous.

Final Thoughts: Despite my initial misgivings, I really did enjoy using Rhapsody. That said, there are still a few “kinks” that need to be ironed out before it can be considered an alternative to iTunes or Slacker. Fix those “issues,” and then we’ll talk.

Overall (out of ten): 6. Great idea; mediocre execution.


Showdown Special, Part Three: Rhapsody on the iPhone (Day One) – Free Line 11/13/09

…And the Showdown rolls on with the Rhapsody iPhone app.

Website: http://www.amazon.com
Developer: RealNetworks
App Type: Music store/audio streaming
The Test: On today’s Showdown, we will be comparing the quality of the Rhapsody audio steams with that of another popular music service, Slacker. Each song was chosen at random by the Slacker player. With that said, here we go:

Song #1: “If Looks Could Kill” by Camera Obscura

Song Style: An upbeat, albeit extremely sarcastic, 60’s-style pop song, complete with a “Phil Spector“-like “layered sound” and a string section.

Slacker: A nice balance, albeit a tad soft at points. The vocals did sort of “blend” into the background, but that has more to do with the song than with the service.

Rhapsody: The surrounding music seems  to “overpower” the vocals. This is most notable at the end of the track, where the vocals are completely overtaken by both the backing band and the trumpet solo.

Winner: Slacker. So what if it gets a tad “soft” at points? That’s what the volume control is made for.

Song #2: “Don’t Let’s Start” by They Might Be Giants

Song Style: A low budget “geek rock” song recorded in an apartment in Brooklyn … on a four-track … in 1986.

Slacker: This as close to “CD quality” as a streaming service can get. Sure, that isn’t hard considering the song’s production values, but still.

Rhapsody: Identical to the Slacker stream, only with a tad more “volume” backing it up.

Winner: Rhapsody. Sometimes, louder really is better.

Song #3: “Free Fallin’” by Tom Petty

Song Style: It’s a Tom Petty song. If you have heard one, you have heard them all.

Slacker: Not bad overall. While the song itself isn’t necessarily “bass heavy,” a little extra push from the lower end of the spectrum would have be nice. On the plus side, Tom Petty’s vocals are nice and nasal clear, which really does add to things.

Rhapsody: In a strange way, this stream is the “Bizarro” to Slacker’s Superman. The backing track, background vocals, and bass are near perfect, but the vocals are muddled and soft.

Winner: Push. While I prefer the Slacker stream, I can’t in good conscience say that it’s “better.”

Song #4: “P.O.V. Waltz” by Harry Nilsson

Song Style: A lush, densely layered waltz. You will never quite hear the same thing twice.

Slacker: Absolutely no complaints. Everything came through perfectly … or so I thought.

Rhapsody: The layered vocal track is much, much clearer. That alone makes the entire song more enjoyable.

Winner: Rhapsody.

Song #5: “World Shut Your Mouth” by Death Cab for Cutie

Song Style: A cover of the Julian Cope new wave classic. The Death Cab version is noticeably faster than the original.

Note: Since I couldn’t find the cover on either YouTube or Daily Motion, I have decided to link the original version.

Slacker: Muddled and loud. For a straight-ahead rock track such as this one, that is a very good thing. The vocals do blend in to the rest of the track, but it works with the song.

Rhapsody: It’s missing something. I don’t know what that “something” is exactly, but it clearly isn’t there.

Winner: Slacker.

Tie Breaker: “Chasin’ Girls” by The Clarks

Song Style: “Americana rock” in the style of Bruce Springsteen. This particular track is bit more “aggressive” (and sarcastic) than normal.

Slacker: Again, no complaints here.

Rhapsody: The band is a bit louder than the vocals. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, however.

Winner: Push. It all comes down to personal preference.

Tie Breaker #2: “Say It All” by Sondre Lerche

Song Style: This song lies somewhere between jazz-inspired pop and new wave. Think Steely Dan, only not boring. Special attention should also be paid to the unique guitar work found on the track. If a technically proficient metal guitarist took up the acoustic guitar, he would be Sondre Lerche.

Slacker: I wish the bass was a bit louder. Other than that, I really can’t find fault here.

Rhapsody: Virtually identical to the Slacker stream.

Winner: Push. Again.

Tie Breaker #3: “We Gotta Get You a Woman” by Todd Rundgren

Song Style: Layers, distortion, key changes, tempo changes, a general “lo-fi” feel … this track quite literally has everything. If any song will break our stalemate, it will be this one.

Slacker: No complaints. This song is actually perfect for live streaming due to the reasons mentioned above.

Rhapsody: This has a much fuller sound than the Slacker stream.

Winner: Rhapsody.

Overall Winner: Rhapsody, by a nose. In all honesty, to call Rhapsody the clear “winner” in this situation would be a tad disingenuous. If we would have gone through a hundred separate songs, it would have been a fifty-fifty split. We just happened to stop testing while Rhapsody was ahead.

…And there you have it. Come back Monday to see a full, in-depth review of the app itself. Until then, we bid thee a fond adieu. Have a great weekend.


Showdown Special, Part Two: Amazon Kindle for the PC – Free Line 11/12/09

…And our cavalcade of “buzzworthy” apps continues with the Amazon Kindle eBook reader for PC.

Website: http://www.amazon.com
Developer: Amazon
App Type: eReader, in a way
Why It Matters: For the past year or so, the Kindle eReader has been the proverbial toast of the town. It made readers squeal with delight, the Author’s Guild a tad “litigious,” and Amazon as rich as Scrooge McDuck. The PC version, apparently, is meant to be the “iTunes” to the Kindle’s iPod — a handy, easy to use application for the times what you’re “stuck” in front of your computer.
The Twist: I honestly do not get the appeal of these things. Sure, there are some cross sections of people that could really use a device like this (students, tour guides, avid role players who have to lug around rule books), but by in large, it just seems like a waste. My reasons are the following:

  1. If I want to read a book, I will pick up a book. It has weight. It has physical depth. It has pages that I can actually touch. It is not a glorified PDF file on a monochrome screen. If I wanted to read something from a screen on the go, I would use my iPhone or my PSP. So what if the screen is smaller? Text is text.
  2. When I want to read something (a book, a magazine, etc), I actually want to get away from a screen. I can’t do that with the Kindle. I am physically stuck staring at yet another screen.
  3. When If I do something tremendously stupid while reading a book — drop it into the lavatory, spill Pepsi on it, and so on — all I have to do dry off the pages. Worst case scenario is that I ruined a $20 book. When If I do something similarly as boneheaded with the Kindle, I will be out a minimum of $200.
  4. My Danny Wallace books don’t run out of batteries. My Danny Wallace eBook, however, would.

All of that said, I am more than willing to change my mind. It will just have to take a lot of convincing. For this test, I will be using three separate books: The Art of War, The Return of Sherlock Holmes, and Oliver Twist. Why did I pick these particular titles? They were free. With that said, here we go:

The Art of War – This is, by far, the nicest PDF that I have ever read. The text is clean and blur free, switching between pages are stupidly simple, and making bookmarks is a snap. That said, it still felt like a PDF. I just cannot get around that.

The Return of Sherlock Holmes – I actually found this one to be easier to read than The Art of War. I have no idea why. It still feels like a classy, high class PDF, however.

Oliver Twist – About the same as Sherlock Holmes. It was easy to read, but … I think you know what my gripes are about now.

Final Thoughts: I honestly can’t say at this point. I need more time playing with it. For now though, I am definitely not a fan. If my mind changes, or if I figure out a way to run traditional PDF files through the “Kindle,” I will definitely let you know.


Showdown Special, Part One: JAHJAH – Free Line 11/11/09

Due to a combination of the recession and the never-ending love fest between Google and 95% of the press, it might seem as if the once steady stream of innovative products and services has finally dried up. I am here today to report that that is simply not true. Sure, there might not as many new apps and the like out there, but that doesn’t mean they have gone away completely. That’s where we come in. Over the next three days, we will be proudly showcasing apps that are both turning heads and taking names. First on the docket is JAHJAH. It calls people! It outsmarts the “phone company” on a fairly regular basis! It has one of the most cutesy, annoying names out there today! But is it any good? You are about to find out.

Website: http://www.jajah.com
Developer: JAHJAH Inc. (For now, at any rate)
App Type: Voice over IP
Why It Matters:
Rumor has it that Google is interested in outright buying the service. That should tell you something.
How It Works: The “JAHJAH” experience is a bit different than what you might be expecting. Unlike Skype and Google Voice, all of the calls are handled directly from the website. After typing the relevant phone numbers — both the person you wish to call and your own home/cell number — you are given the option of either dialing from the web or connecting using a provided telephone number. The latter is apparently designed to eliminate pesky long distance and international calling fees. For the purposes of this Showdown, I will be using both methods.
Dialing from the Web: When I first hit the “dial now” button, I was greeted by an error message that really didn’t make much sense. After staring blankly for a few seconds, I found that it could only be corrected by signing up. After a simple and completely painless registration form, I was ready to give JAH JAH another go. I logged into the site, only to find that the number I that I wanted to dial was nowhere to be found. I did, however, get the opportunity to call the “test” line … three times. After each call, I was asked if I wanted to “add funds” to my account. I chose “no,” as I really don’t have any desire to drop the “Skype/iPhone” combination that I use now. I was then whisked back to the “test call” page for seemingly no reason. I had to dig through the unorganized mess that is JAHJAH’s site in order to find the number that I was looking for. I clicked on the button, only to discover that a totally mediocre phone experience was waiting for me on the other side. The audio was muffled, distant sounding, and had the tendency to “cut out” from time to time.  I hung up, hoping that the “JAHJAH.direct” service would be a bit more rewarding.
JAHJAH.direct: Before I could even start the call, the robotic lady on the other end of the line informed me that I have no money left on my account. I can, however, sign up for “pre-call advertising.” I did and dialed the number, only to find that I have, again, run out of funds. It turns out that the advertising is designed to give users a “refund” at the end of each month. I was running out of both options and patience. As a last ditch effort, I signed up again, this time using a different email address and phone number. It didn’t exactly work out as planned, as I still needed to add a credit card to my account. So I can’t try JAHJAH.direct without paying money. Big deal. I have a whole eight minutes to burn. This could mean only one thing…
Dialing from the Web … To a Skype Phone: That’s right. I used one VoIP service to call another. Did it work? Yes, but the sound quality wasn’t anything to write home about. Oh well. At least I can say that I tried.
Final Thought: While it’s a nice way to avoid international long distance, JAHJAH is just too “pedestrian” to become a full-on “Skype alternative.” Upgrade your systems and redesign your site. Then we’ll talk.
Overall (Out of ten): 6

Come back tomorrow for part two of our three part series. Until then, I bid thee a fond adieu.


Technological Misfires (Celebrity Edition), Day Two: BAD “Enters a New Ride” – Free Line 10/27/09

My apologies, but our piece on Al Gore’s Current TV has be postponed. Expect to see it tomorrow. In the meantime…

Punk. There are few words in the English language that can bring up such passion in a human being. To some, the word “punk” conjurers up images of Johnny Rotten, Joey Ramone, and/or Henry Rollins singing as loud as humanly possible to a room of angry, yet strangely happy, teenagers. To others, it is a word that describes those “rotten kids” that knock over old people’s garbage cans and casually walk on their lawns. There are even those who associate the word with a certain world champion professional wrestler. By and large, though, “punk” has come to mean one thing: Doing or saying something that will ultimately upset the “establishment,” AKA “The Man.” Our story today deals with the latter most concept.

In the world of music, “going punk” can be achieved in several different ways. The normally loud and bombastic Green Day went “punk” by writing a gentle, albeit extremely sarcastic, ballad that is still heard on soft rock stations to this day. Japanese band The Pillows go “punk” by writing and performing songs in English. Sure, most of their English-language material make absolutely no sense, but that’s the point. Big Audio Dynamite (also known as BAD), on the other hand, didn’t have to write a sappy sounding song or adopt a foreign language in order to bother “The Man.” All they did was release an album of original material on the Internet … for free … in 1997. To truly enjoy the tale that I am going to relate, you will need to know a bit of the back story.

The band Big Audio Dynamite was formed in 1984 by Mick Jones, the guitarist for legendary punk band The Clash. Unlike The Clash, Big Audio Dynamite was more concerned with having a good time than it was proving a political point. To accentuate this point — or rather, the complete and total lack of one — Jones brought a myriad of modern styles to the table, including reggae, electronica, and ’80’s-style dance music. BAD was also one of the first bands to embrace hip hop-level sampling. Nowhere is this more apparent than in their signature hit “Rush,” which relies on The Who’s “Baba O’ Reilly” to provide much of the counter melody. While not nearly as successful as Jones’ previous band, BAD was respected by fans and critics alike for embracing the unknown, both sonically and otherwise.

Fast forward to 1998. Although Big Audio Dynamite still had their loyal fan base, their days of topping the charts had long since passed. Their previous album, “F-Punk,” contained no hit singles and was panned by almost every critic alive. In an effort to return the mainstream, Mick Jones recruited former English Beat and  General Public lead singer Ranking Roger to handle the vocals on the new album, tentatively entitled “Entering a New Ride.” The only potential roadblock facing Jones and company was BAD’s record label, Radioactive Records. To say that Radioactive hated the new album was an understatement. It was so reviled, in fact, that the big brass wouldn’t even release it. Faced with what seemed to be a no-win situation, Jones did what any sane, reasonable person would have done at the time: He released the album on the Internet for free. Every week for eighteen weeks, a brand new Wave file was uploaded to a specially designed website. Sure, the band lost a bundle on the deal, but what did it really matter? Somebody, somewhere was listening to the new album, and that was enough.

Now you’re probably wondering why I consider this to be a “misfire.” After all, it really was a creative, inventive way to make the best out of a bad situation. It all comes down to six “issues” for me:

  1. The File Type Issue – The average size for a four minute Wave file is roughly 45 megabytes. Now picture yourself loading that 45 megabyte file eighteen times over a “super fast” 28.8 modem.
  2. The Website Issue – The website was the only place that this album was available. The second it was taken down, the album disappeared from the face of the Earth. And no, that is not an exaggeration. I spent hours looking for this album — iTunes, those quasi-legal Russian downloading sites, BitTorrent — only to hit dead end after dead end. The closest I came was a fan site that “claimed” to have the album in full. Unfortunately, it lead me to a dead link.
  3. The “Money” Issue – As I said above, no one made a dime off of this.
  4. The “Computer” Issue – Not many people had CD burners in 1997. If you wanted to listen to this album, you either had to go to your computer or hook up a cassette deck to the sound card. While the former was good for the occasional listen, it made repeat listening all but impossible. As for the latter, well … even the best tape could not match the sound of a Wave file. Sure, it was better than nothing, but still.
  5. The Lack of Proper Advertising - Despite their handful of hit recordings, Big Audio Dynamite wasn’t necessarily the biggest band in the world. As such, not many people actually knew about this until much, much later. A bigger band would have been able to advertise a bit more.
  6. The Novel Approach – It’s a new idea. Problems like those mentioned above are bound to happen.

…And there you have it. While it might not have been the most practical or “cost effective” idea out there, “Entering a New Ride” helped to establish the “downloading” culture we know and love today. And that, my friends, is about as “punk” as a human being can possibly get.


A Lesson in Arrogance, Part Three: Can You Say “Deja Vu?” – Free Line 10/20/09

Hello and welcome to part three of our little Lesson in Arrogance. So, without further procrastination, we present to you the “payoff.”

At this point in the story, you’re probably wondering what any of this “wrestling talk” has to do with the Family Guy-themed Windows 7 infomercial that Seth MacFarlane is currently producing. To put it simply, it is proof that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. In other words, this upcoming special could very well be MacFarlane’s “Finger Poke of Doom.” Allow me to explain.

Eric Bischoff’s entire WCW reign was based around the idea that he was not the establishment, also known as Vince McMahon’s WWF. McMahon wants to jettison all his established stars in order to save money? Well Bischoff is not only going to open up Ted Turner’s bottomless checkbook, he is going to rip off the cover. McMahon wants to put the hype machine behind several six foot-plus behemoths that have a few issues with “performance enhancing drugs?” Bischoff is going to scour the world for those who are the very antithesis of that ideal. It took some time to get people to notice his “unique” concepts, but once they did, they came in droves.

Seth MacFarlane is the same exact way. When it first debuted, Family Guy was considered to be animated equivalent to a ten-car pile up. There were jokes that didn’t relate to anything. There were references to things that no one even came close to remembering, such as obscure title sequences and one-off Monty Python skits. The fictional town of Quohog itself featured everything from a talking dog and a homicidal baby to a man in a chicken costume and eccentric actor Adam West. There was some “problems” at the beginning — Family Guy was canceled twice — but after a while, the general public began to “warm up” to MacFarlane’s brand of bizarre humor.  Perhaps the proudest moment for MacFarlane’s creation came in early 2005, when fan demand all but forced Fox to renew the show. At that point in time, Family Guy was one of the biggest success stories ever to come out of the world of television, bar none.

Then a funny thing happened: All of the success, accolades, and newspaper articles started going to their respective heads. With Bischoff, the arrogance manifested itself as “Uncle Eric,” a brash, sarcastic on-screen authority figure that delighted in the misfortune of others. Each week, Bischoff, along with his compatriots in the NWO New World Order, easily one of the most popular wrestling stables (groups) of all time — would openly mock anything that came to mind. Everything was fair game, from the “live-action cartoon nature” of the competition to “reminiscing” about the time he fired then-rising star Steve Austin via FedEx. In one particularly memorable segment, Bischoff openly challenged Vince McMahon to a wrestling match. When McMahon “no-showed” the event, Bischoff was declared the winner by forfeit. While taking pot shots at the competition was nothing new in the world of wrestling, Bischoff’s “in-ring rant sessions” took things to a whole other level. A somewhat scripted segment between wrestlers was one thing. A thinly-veiled proclamation of superiority by the boss on live television was quite another.

As the years went on, so did Bischoff’s reliance on his seminal idea, the NWO. By the time of the Finger Poke of Doom, there were five versions of the group active, including the LWO (made up primarily of wrestlers of Latino decent) and the B-Team, whose job it was to “lay down” (take a dive) for the stars. Ironically, just as fans began to grow tired of the NWO, Bischoff’s air of invincibility increased. It reached a point where such television terms as “quarter hour returns” and “pay-per-view buy rates” became as familiar to the WCW faithful as words like “pin” and “title match.” Even the visible cracks formed by the Goldberg/Kevin Nash match at the Starrcade pay-per-view weren’t enough warn the man in charge. He was still on top, and that was all mattered.

MacFarlane’s arrogance, on the other hand, started to show itself  in a slightly different fashion. Instead of physically saying what was on his mind like Bischoff did, he let it all come out in his work. Gradually, the stories and Manatee jokes became more focused on “shock value” than the more traditional humor found in Family Guy’s first three seasons. Nowhere was this more apparent than in the infamous “prom night dumpster baby” sketch, in which a cadre of newly born babies sing about being abandoned in an alley. To say that the new direction was “controversial” amongst fans would be an understatement. Some applauded the change, calling MacFarlane and company “fearless and creative.” Others were rather disappointed by the new episodes, saying that the writers “forgot how to be funny.” Either way, people were talking.

In addition to the increased use of Manatee jokes, the writing staff became more dependent on using their own political views in their storytelling. Stories about patriarch Peter Griffin playing the piano while drunk or baby Stewie trying to sabotage his parents attempt to have a fourth child were “phased out” in favor of episodes about partial-birth abortion and the impact that Wal-Mart has on small town America. Brian, once considered to be the most popular character on the show, now spent most of his screen time criticizing such things as capitalism, the Republican party, and organized religion (namely Christianity and Judaism.) The days of jokes about television programs from the 1980’s and the Fonz were long, long gone.

Now before we get to the main point, we need to make one thing perfectly clear: We are not saying MacFarlane has reached Eric Bischoff-levels of arrogance just because he dares to be political. What does bring him to that plane, however, is his insistence that his fans should appreciate anything that he produces, regardless their own personal point-of-view. “[There are some fans who] watch every week, and every week they talk about how terrible the show is,” said MacFarlane in his September 2009 Playboy interview. “That’s something you see in animation fans, science fiction fans and comic book fans—all the nerds, basically. Nerds can get really angry. This is not meant to sound insensitive to their plight, but when you pour a disproportionate amount of your life force into one particular thing you can lose some objectivity.”

…So here it is, the reason for our three-day story. It all boils down down one simple idea: MacFarlane has become a hypocrite, just like Eric Bischoff did ten years earlier. When he first started, Eric Bischoff wanted nothing more than to create a wrestling that was anti-Vince McMahon and Vince Russo– gritty, realistic, and devoid of the “spectacle” atmosphere and publicity stunts that the WWF prided themselves on. By the time The Finger Poke of Doom rolled around, Nitro was everything he claimed that he hated. Aside from Goldberg, “Diamond” Dallas Page, and Sting, all of the stars were made famous by McMahon’s hype machine. Loyal fans were basically told by the announcers to watch “that other” show, but only if they promised to return for the main event. When they did return, they got to witness one of the most bizarre moments in wrestling history. Some were angry, some were confused, but for the most part, everyone agreed on the following two points:

  1. It was the last thing anyone wanted to see.
  2. Be it for better or for worse, Monday nights now belonged to Raw. It might not be perfect, but at least it was better than this. To put it in another way, Mick Foley really did put asses in the seats, both physically and metaphorically.

In the case of Seth MacFarlane, his hypocrisy comes from his seemingly cavalier disregard for the beliefs that he holds dear. On one hand, MacFarlane has gone out of his way to preach the gospels of artistic freedom and modern liberalism to anyone that would listen. But on the other hand, he is willing to work with Microsoft, a company that many within his own belief structure feel is a heartless, soulless monopoly that is keeping the masses from discovering Linux. To make matters worse, said “cold, heartless monopoly” will have the final say on all of the jokes and skits found in the special itself. After all, things like “prom night dumpster baby” or “Herbert the elderly pedophile”  are not conducive to moving copies of Windows. And that is why they are there, after all. If history does indeed repeat itself, the special will be followed by a few angry rants, a negative article or two and a solemn vow never to watch Family Guy ever again. It’s the Finger Poke of Doom 2009 … and the perpetrators were too full of themselves to ever see it coming.

…And there you have it. Be sure to check back tomorrow to view our “Five things you can do to avoid your own Finger Poke of Doom.” Until then, we bid thee a fond adieu.


A Lesson In Arrogance, Part Two: What Just Happened Here? – Free Line 10/19/09

Hello and welcome back to our little Lesson in Arrogance. When we last left our shows, WCW lead announcer Tony Schiavone, under the behest of show runner Eric Bischoff, just informed the viewing audience that fan favorite Mick Foley was finally going to win the WWF Title. Naturally, millions simultaneously switched over to Raw just to see it happen. And now that you’re up to date, we bring you the exciting conclusion.

As foolish as the move seemed on the surface, there was indeed a method to Bischoff’s madness. Yes, his ratings would temporarily take a nose dive while wrestling fans watched the WWF, but the ratings would immediately shoot back up again after the match ended. How did he know this? Simple — the Foley/Rock title match was taking place before the scheduled Kevin Nash/Hulk Hogan match up on Nitro. While the world was watching the competition, the WCW faithful were “treated” to under card acts like Konnan, Scott Steiner, Wrath, and Bam Bam Bigelow. When the millions returned to Nitro, they were greeted by former champion and fan favorite “Diamond” Dallas Page beating upon perennial jobbers — the wrestling equivalent to a “tomato can” from boxing and MMA — Brian Adams and Mike “Virgil” Jones. Still, everything was riding on the Kevin Nash/”Hollywood” Hulk Hogan main event. If everything happened exactly right, then no one would remember the little “faux pas” involving Mick Foley and “that other company.” The key word in that sentence, however, is “if.”

Before we discuss the actual main event, you have to realize how big this match truly was. By 1999, Hulk Hogan rarely appeared on free television. Bischoff simply mentioning that “Hollywood was in the building” made fans sit up and take notice. Sure, he was usually there to hype some made-for-TV movie or the next pay-per-view event, but that really didn’t matter. The simple fact that he was there at all was good enough. Even those who legitimately hated Hogan wanted to see him, if for no other reason than to boo him mercilessly. But to have him there and working the main event was completely unfathomable. All they would have to do is deliver a solid main event. If they do that, then everything is fine. There’s that “if” again…

So after all the hype, all of the swerves (again, plot twists), and all of the comments, it was finally time for the main event. Hogan came out first, acting like a kid who was just caught doing something he shouldn’t have been doing. Nash, on the other hand, looked primed and ready. He had everything going for him — the fans, the title, even two-thirds of the announce team. Hogan nervously walked over to the champ, only to be pushed back into the corner of the ring. He started to throw a punch, but stopped. Instead, he decided it would be best to lightly poke his opponent in the shoulder. Nash, of course, did what any good champion would do in that situation: Fall flat on his back, acting as if he was just knocked out. Hogan casually got down to the mat and pinned Nash. The newly reunited duo of Kevin Nash and Hulk Hogan spent the rest of allotted television time laughing at the fans.

Just in case you missed the “payoff” (climax), allow me to say it again: Hulk Hogan defeated Kevin Nash in five seconds by pushing him over with his finger. The two wrestlers then began to mock the very people who indirectly pay their salaries. It wasn’t exciting. It wasn’t even enjoyable. To most fans, the so-called “Finger Poke of Doom” was proof positive that WCW was going down the tubes. The next week, many of them switched over to Raw and never looked back. Within six months, Eric Bischoff would be “sent home,” a wrestling term that basically translates to “one step below being fired.” Within two and a half years, WCW would be sold to Vince McMahon for next to nothing. Ted Turner’s worst wrestling-related nightmare had finally come true.

…And there you have it. Come back tomorrow to see how this whole crazy thing ties together.


Monday Showdown: Making Up For Lost Time (Part One) – Free Line 10/13/09

…And we’re back! As you might have noticed, we have been a bit “preoccupied” as of late. Because of this, we have let a few “newer” services fall by the wayside. So obviously, there is only one thing that we can do to rectify the situation: Have a Showdown! So sit back, relax, and enjoy this massive, two-day journey through the new and scary.

App #1: Yahoo Meme

Website: http://meme.yahoo.com/home/
Developer: Yahoo
Type: Web service
Speciality: Microblogging
Why We Consider It to Be New: The service itself was released early last August. The API was released yesterday.
First Impression: “It’s cute. Not as cute as Plurk, but cute nonetheless.”
Potential Roadblock: English language users seem to be in short supply at the moment.

App #2: hi5

Website: http://www.hi5.com/
Developer: hi5 Networks
Type: Web service
Speciality: Social network
Why We Consider It to Be New: Hi5 has undergone what some might call a “gimmick change.” Instead of being a straight social network, hi5 now puts much of its focus on casual gaming. (Note: We here at the Free Line hate the terms “casual games” and “casual gaming.” From this point forward, all games of that nature will be referred to as “fidget games.”)
First Impression: “I love me a good fidget game.”
Potential Roadblock: None at the present moment. The Showdown is still young, however.

App #3: CNN Mobile

Website: N/A
Developer: CNN Interactive Group, Inc.
Type: iPhone Application
Speciality:
News app
Why We Consider It to Be New:
…Because it is. According to the iPhone app store, version 1.0 was released on September 24th. That seems pretty darn new to me…
First Impression: “This … Is (the iPhone-centric, mobile version of) CNN.”
Potential Roadblock: One can only take “so much” of cable news before going completely off of his or her rocker.
Note: I will be judging the app itself, not the reporting that lies therein. The Free Line is roughly 99.995% “politics free,” and I plan on keeping it that way.

App #4: iDrudge

Website: http://www.drudgereport.com (Original site)
Developer: Joseph Nardone
Type: iPhone Application
Speciality: News app
Why We Consider It to Be New: Again, it is. Version 1.2 was released at the beginning of October.
First Impression: “Why did the program close just now?”
Potential Roadblock: The program seems to be a tad “touchy,” as they say.
Note: Remember the disclaimer to the CNN app? The same exact thing applies here. As far as this blog is concerned, the app is everything.

App #5: Photoshop.com Mobile

Website: N/A
Developer: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Type: iPhone Application
Speciality: Photo editor
Why We Consider It to Be New: It’s five-days old.
First Impression: “It’s free?! I wonder what’s wrong with it…”
Potential Roadblock: This isn’t the original “Photoshop” that we’re talking about here. It’s Photoshop.com. Remember our last go around with Photoshop.com? If you do, then you know firsthand why we consider this to be a roadblock.

Next Page »


Close
E-mail It